Sustainable Energy Development - How Costs Can Be Cut In Half

Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of the Unitedlends them to the government and to commercial
Nations, stated in an October 15, 2007 address,banks.
"Climate change is a defining issue of our time. TheThe process by which banks create money is
science is clear. . . . We know what we have to do.inherently inflationary, because they lend only the
We have affordable measures and technologies toprincipal, not the interest necessary to pay their loans
do it." What we don't have is the money - at least,off. To come up with the interest, new loans must
we don't have it under the current system ofbe taken out, continually inflating the money supply
bank-created credit.with new loan-money. And since the money is going
We also don't have time. Ban Ki-moon went on:to the creditors rather than into producing new
"Traveling in Chad recently, I saw first-hand thegoods and services, demand (money) is increasing
humanitarian toll of climate change. An estimated 20without increasing supply, producing price inflation. If
million people depend on a lake and river system thatcredit were extended by governments interest-free,
has shrunk to a tenth of its original size over theinflation might actually be reduced, by reducing the
past 30 years. In Africa right now, the worst rains inneed to continually take out new loans to find the
memory are washing hundreds of thousands ofelusive interest to service old loans.
people from their homes. These are signs of what isHISTORICAL PRECEDENTS
to come. The problems our generation faces will beGovernment-issued money to fund public projects is
worse for our children, particularly if we do not act. . .not a new idea but has a long and successful history.
. We must engage the private sector, stimulateAmong other notable examples:
economic activity, use new financing andIn the early eighteenth century, the colony of
market-based approaches, develop and transferPennsylvania issued money that was both lent and
know-how, and create jobs."spent by the local government into the economy,
In the fall of 2007, the United Nations Developmentproducing an unprecedented period of prosperity.
Program (UNDP) sought ideas for a debate to beThis was done not without producing price inflation
held in Bali in December 2007, involving innovativeand without taxing the people.
ways to fund the costs of adapting to climateWhen Abraham Lincoln needed money to fund the
change in the developing world. My submission wasAmerican Civil War, rather than paying 25 to 36
not adopted, but I think it would work. It is below.percent interest charges, he avoided going into debt
(For footnotes, seeby printing Greenback dollars that were "legal tender"
FUNDING PUBLIC PROJECTS WITHin themselves. Again, historians of the period attest
PUBLICLY-ISSUED MONEYthat this issue of Greenbacks was not responsible for
Governments have the sovereign right to create andprice inflation.
lend money. The United Nations could assume thatThe island state of Guernsey, located in the Channel
right as well, just as the International Monetary FundIslands, has been funding infrastructure with
has assumed the right to issue credit in the form ofgovernment-issued money for over 200 years,
"Special Drawing Rights" that are convertible intowithout price inflation and without government debt.
national currencies. As will be shown here,During the First World War, when private banks were
government-issued or U.N.-issued money could bedemanding 6 percent interest, Australia's
used for sustainable energy projects without causingpublicly-owned Commonwealth Bank financed the
inflation, and this could be profitably done even byAustralian government's war effort at an interest
impoverished governments with weak legalrate of a fraction of 1 percent, saving Australians
structures and immature government accountabilitysome $12 million in bank charges. After the First
mechanisms.World War, the bank's governor used the bank's
Credit created by governments or the United Nationscredit power to save Australians from the depression
would have the advantage that it could be issuedconditions prevailing in other countries, by financing
interest-free. Eliminating the cost of interest could cutproduction and home-building and lending funds to
production costs dramatically. Interest composes aslocal governments for the construction of roads,
much as 77% of the cost of capital-intensive goodstramways, harbors, gasworks, and electric power
and services such as public housing. The average isplants. The bank's profits were paid back to the
brought down by labor-intensive services such asnational government.
garbage collection, for which interest makes up onlyA successful infrastructure program funded with
about 12% of the cost; but the overall average costinterest-free "national credit" was also instituted in
of interest has been estimated at about half ofNew Zealand after it elected its first Labor
everything we buy. If money for alternative energygovernment in the 1930s. Credit issued by its
projects were issued interest-free, projects thatnationalized central bank allowed New Zealand to
have been considered unsustainable because of thethrive at a time when the rest of the world was
burden of interest could become not onlystruggling with poverty and lack of productivity.
self-sustaining but highly profitable for the fundingAccording to a book titled State Housing in New
governments.Zealand published by the Ministry of Works in 1949:
In "The Modern Universal Paradigm" (2007), Rodney"To finance its comprehensive proposals, the
Shakespeare gives the example of the HumberGovernment adopted the somewhat unusual course
Bridge, which was built in the UK at a cost of 98of using Reserve Bank credit, thus recognizing that
million. Every year since the bridge opened in 1981, itthe most important factor in housing costs is the
has turned an operating profit; that is, its runningprice of money - interest is the heaviest portion in
costs (basically repair, maintenance and staff salaries)the composition of rent. . . . This action showed . . . it
have been exceeded by the fees it receives fromwas possible for the State to use the country's
travelers crossing the river Humber. But by the timecredit in creating new assets for the country."
the bridge opened in 1981, interest charges hadStan Fitchett, writing in the New Zealand Guardian
driven its cost up to 151 million; and by 1992, only 10Political Review in 2004, explored whether this
years later, the debt had shot up to a breath-takingapproach would create price inflation today. He
439 million. The UK government was forced toconfirmed with bank officials that 97 percent of the
intervene with sizeable grants and writeoffs to saveNew Zealand money supply is now created by
the local residents from bearing the brunt of thesecommercial banks when they make loans. The year
costs. If the bridge had been financed withhe was writing, the money supply increased by
interest-free, government-issued money, these costs18,527 million New Zealand dollars, or 16.8 percent;
could have been avoided and the bridge could haveand 97 percent of this increase came from
funded itself.commercial bank lending. Fitchett confirmed with
THE INFLATION OBJECTIONbanking experts that if the Reserve Bank had
The argument against governments issuing andcreated 100 million New Zealand dollars for new
lending money for development projects is that ithouses in New Zealand, the sum would have had no
would be inflationary, but this need not be the case.noticeable impact on inflation, since it was only
Price inflation results when "demand" (money)one-half of one percent of what was already being
increases faster than "supply" (goods and services).added to the money supply annually by private
As economist John Maynard Keynes pointed out,commercial banks. Similar figures apply in the United
when the national currency is expanded to fundStates and other countries.
productive projects, supply goes up along withIMPLICATIONS FOR THE CURRENT CLIMATE
demand, leaving consumer prices unaffected.CRISIS
Moreover, private banks themselves create theDevelopment loans have become debt traps for
money they lend. Many authorities have confirmedmany Third World countries, as interest has
this fact, including the Federal Reserve itself. Thecompounded annually on loans of money created by
Chicago Federal Reserve exposed the mechanics ofcommercial banks with accounting entries. If
money creation in a publication called "Modern Moneygovernments or the United Nations would take over
Mechanics," in which it said:that function and advance credit created with
"Of course, they [commercial banks] do not reallyaccounting entries themselves, the crippling expense
pay out loans from the money they receive asof compound interest could be eliminated.
deposits. If they did this, no additional money wouldInterest-free loans could help ease the current crises
be created. What they do when they make loans isnot only of climate change but of housing, energy,
to accept promissory notes in exchange for creditsinfrastructure, food, and health care.
to the borrowers' transaction accounts."Funds for public development could be advanced as
See also "Money Facts," published in 1964 by"contingent grants." If the projects were profitable,
Congressman Wright Patman, Chairman of thethe money would be returned to the government
Subcommittee on Domestic Finance of the Bankingfrom profits. Private contractors could be hired to do
and Currency Committee. Responding to the questionthe work, but the projects would remain public
"Do private banks issue money today?", he wrote:assets that continued to produce profits for the
"Yes. Although banks no longer have the right tobenefit of the government and the people. To
issue bank notes, they can create money in the formprevent abuse, the money would not simply be given
of bank deposits when they lend money toaway but would have to be repaid on a regular
businesses, or buy securities. . . . The important thingpayment schedule, just as private loans are now. The
to remember is that when banks lend money theyonly difference would be that the credits would be
don't necessarily take it from anyone else to lend.advanced by the government or the United Nations
Thus they "create" it."rather than by private commercial banks, and they
During the recent bank credit crisis in August 2007,would not be burdened with interest.
the central banks of the United States, Europe,Interest-free credit could turn alternative energy
Canada, Australia and Japan collectively extended aproposals that would have been priced out of the
$315 billion credit line to commercial banks. This creditprivate credit market into profitable ventures, even
was created out of nothing (something central banksfor poor countries lacking financial and other
assume the right to do as "lenders of last resort"),resources. Among many interesting possibilities for
and the sums advanced were huge. For comparativelocal energy production is this one drawn by Rodney
purposes, a mere $188 billion would have beenShakespeare from the bio-fuel field:
enough to repair all of the 74,000 U.S. bridges known"[W]hile traditional crops have yields of around 50-150
to be defective, preventing another disaster like thatgallons of bio-diesel per acre per year, it is today
in Minnesota in July 2007. The Carbon Trust, abeing claimed that algae can yield 5,000-20,000 gallons
well-known UK company dedicated to cutting carbonper acre per year. . . . The algae are grown in
emissions, is responsible for reducing emissions by"solaroof" (plastic greenhouse-type) structures using
nearly 2 million tons per year on a 2007 budget ofa new, simple technology . . . [I]t is being claimed that
only £115.9 million (about $240 million U.S.). Ifthe algae processes are financially viable even under
central banks can create hundreds of billions of dollarsthe existing economic and financial system which
to save floundering private banks, governments canuses interest-bearing money. If that is true, then the
create comparable credits to adapt to climateworld can be saved from global warming and, even it
change, an even more pressing problem.if it is not true, there is obviously still the clear
The sovereign right to issue money actually belongspossibility that the use of interest-free loans for algae
to governments, not to private banks; but fewproduction . . . would be sufficient to make the
governments exercise that right today. The onlyoutcome financially viable. Crucially, the localized
money the U.S. government issues are coins, whichproduction of the algae would enable the localized
compose only about one one-thousandth of the U.S.production of electricity thereby eliminating the need
money supply (M3). All of the rest is created byfor huge electricity distribution networks. . . . [T]he
private banking institutions when they make loans.new technological solutions are local and are part of a
This includes the privately-owned Federal Reserve,new attitude to life which can be summarized as
which creates Federal Reserve Notes (dollar bills) andsustainable living rather than sustainable development.