Tales of Organisational Abuse

The three-year Commission to Inquire into the Dublindemanding why the last directive has not been
Archdiocese investigated hundreds of incidents ofcomplied within the deadline specified.
abuse and showed the ways in which decades ofThe group of managers I am working with are using
exploitation of children had been covered over bythe time we spend together as a reflective space to
the active participation of the legal authorities andthink about the difficulties of managing. One of the
four archbishops. Bishops, priests and religious ordersthings they return to again and again is the time that
in the diocese had clear knowledge of allegations andit takes to respond to the endless new initiatives that
practice of abuse going back to the early 70s andthe strategy process has thrown up. The managers
there were complaints made against 28 priests, somepresent do not consider themselves 'against change',
of whom were known by the church authorities toindeed they are committed to what they are doing,
be abusers even before they became priests. Theand are constantly making the necessary
report concludes that:improvements and adjustments irrespective of the
The Archdiocese was pre-occupied until thecorporate strategy. Indeed, many of them would
mid-1990s with maintaining secrecy, avoiding scandal,already consider themselves quite entrepreneurial.
protecting the reputation of the Church andHowever, the anxiety that surrounds the strategy
preservation of assets.for everyone concerned has created an environment
I listened in horror to radio reports by those who hadwhere it has become quite difficult to argue against
been abused who either felt unable to raise theirwhat is being proposed, no matter how unworkable
voices, or if they did raise them they were accusedsome of the suggestions. The managers I am
of trying to undermine the authority and dignity ofworking with have a variety of responses: some just
the church and of spreading malicious rumours. Peoplekeep their heads down and hope that senior
who raised their allegations were often publicly vilified.management scrutiny will pass them by; others write
Such an enduring tale of abuse over such a longlong and patient e-mails explaining why what is being
period of time can only be sustained by people in allproposed is unworkable or even counterproductive.
positions actively or passively colluding in what isOthers do their best to comply with what is being
going on. Every day, in small ways and in large, theput forward even though this sometimes puts them
way these matters were discussed and acted uponin a position of having later to apologise to their
undermined or amplified those processes of abuseteams if the initiative proves to be unimplementable.
which were being suffered by children. It may notThere is agreement in the group that these proposals
always have been clear what was going on as theare hard to resist, and that it is difficult to speak out
brilliant film Doubt starring Meryl Streep illustrates soagainst them for fear of being labelled uncooperative
well, but there are enough accounts in the report toor against change. There are a few brave souls who
make it clear that this exploitation was not onlydo, but these tend to be older, more experienced
known about but that people actively covered itcolleagues who are close to retirement or who feel
over 'for the good of the church'.that their position within the institution is powerful,
In much more minor ways one can experience similardespite their rank. Being able to speak out or not
abusive processes taking place in organisations.becomes a judgement about one's relative power in
I have been working with a group of senior middlethe organisation. There is another interesting
managers in a not-for-profit organisation where thephenomenon happening: there are one or two
Director has developed what she considers a 'strongcolleagues who used to be senior middle managers
vision' for the institution which relies upon it beingwho have been promoted. While they would once
publicly perceived as being very entrepreneurial. Incomplain about the way they themselves have been
the spirit of the times it is understood to be a goodtreated in managerial processes, now, in public at
thing to be business-oriented, and the organisationleast, they appear to be speaking out in support of
has been attracting a lot of notice for the claims thatwhat is happening. It is almost as if the higher up the
it has been making. There is a good deal of bothorganisation they go, they more they are obliged to
excitement and opposition to the idealised claim to be'play the game'. This change in attitude is dispiriting
entrepreneurial from different groups within thefor their ex-colleagues who have watched them climb
institution, depending on the length of time they havethe greasy pole hoping that they would make a
spent in the organisation, their professionaldifference when they got there, and of course,
background or their values. So, for example, some ofinvisible to the public eye, this might be exactly what
the managers in the organisation have moved fromthey are doing.
business to a different career and do not have theI am by no means making a claim of moral
same idealised understanding of what it means to beequivalence between the degree of abuse
entrepreneurial as the director and some of herexperienced by hundreds of children in Ireland for
colleagues seem to.decades with level of what might be better termed
The visioning and strategy-making process hasinstitutional bullying in contemporary organisations. The
spawned a whole set of organisation-wide initiatives,kind of abuse that the children in Ireland have
however, which are aimed at 'realising the vision'.suffered is likely to have ruined their lives. What is
These range from something called 'small steps forinteresting to me though, is the dynamic that arises in
change' where departments are invited to send aorganisations where the day to day relationships
'champion' to a regular meeting to explain how theybetween people contribute to the covering over of
have made small steps towards being moreabusive relationships because of an appeal to a higher
entrepreneurial, through to 'challenge meetings' wheregood, the good of the church or the good of an
senior managers are invited to given an account ofidealised vision. There is a very powerful game being
why they have or haven't become moreplayed which is extremely difficult for individuals to
entrepreneurial to a star chamber of other seniorchange on their own except in small ways, although
managers. The challenge meetings have indeed beensmall changes may eventually lead to large ones. Both
very challenging with incidents of senior managerssituations have, to a greater or lesser degree, the
shouting at more junior managers and demandingcharacteristics of totalitarianism and it takes a good
that they justify themselves. New initiatives aredeal of both detachment and courage to do
often followed up by quite peremptory e-mailssomething about it.