Whether Crime Prevention Should Be A Priority In The Criminal Justice System

Introductionhave no room to have fresh start because most of
The criminal justice system is evolving with time.them lack public goodwill. What this does is that it
Gone are the days when it simply focused on longencourages them to continue with a life of crime
prison sentences as the only way to deal with crime.because they feel that society is already biased
Public opinion is changing and so should the criminaltowards them. One can therefore conclude that the
justice system. There is more emphasis on attackingcriminal justice system has not been very effective in
underlying causes and not just surface issues. Morethe process of dealing with future crime incidences.
and more experts agree that crime prevention is theCrime prevention is the only alternative to this
way to go in this situation. They assert that prisonendless cycle of crime. (Oxford Handbook of
sentences, especially for non-violent offenders, onlyCriminology, p13, 2003)
deal with the problem temporarily. They also believeNipping crime at the bud
that crime prevention should be the centrepiece ofMany experts have argued that crime prevention will
the criminal justice system. (Pfeiffer, p 55, 2003)be more successful since most hard core criminals
Crime prevention should be the focus of the criminalstarted out as youthful vandals who were shown the
justice system because it has overwhelming publicright direction. Some people have argued that the
supportcountries that have implemented crime prevention
A Research conducted by the Heart Researchstrategies have been very effective in crime
Associates Inc. on the perception of the public onstoppage. A case in point is the battle against alcohol
crime prevention found that majority of the peopleand drug abuse in Sweden. The campaign was
believed in a more pro-active rather than reactivestarted by psychologist and criminologist Nils Bejerot.
approach. This research was conducted in the yearHe believed that the drug control system used in
2002. But ten years ago, when the public was askedSweden before his reforms was quite inadequate. He
about what they thought about crime prevention,asserted that if the new carriers of the drug taking
42% said the criminal justice system should focus onhabit were dealt with before hand, then there would
punitive action while 48% supported crimebe chances of preventing them from becoming
prevention. These statistics have changed drasticallyambassadors for the drug taking problem. He
with time. In 2002, when a similar research wasconducted an experiment in the year 1965 at
conducted by the same research company, it wasStockholm.
found that 65% of the public believe in dealing withThis psychiatrist suggested that those who had been
root causes while 32% wanted more severecaught by police using small amounts of drugs should
measures to take precedence in the criminal justicebe placed in treatment program that is mandatory in
system. The survey also indicated the followingnature. This would go along way in ensuring that all
preferences.the future cases of drug dealing were taken care of.
PreventionIn line with the program, local authorities should
39-Yesconduct follow ups to ensure that those particular
37-Nocandidates stay committed to the prevention
Punishmentprogram. This has gone along way in eliminating drug
21-Yesabuse cases in Sweden. Statistics testify to the
20-Noeffectiveness of this strategy. In Sweden only one in
Enforcement1,400 may be imprisoned for possession of illegal
18-Yesdrugs. This is such an achievement given the fcat
19-Nothat other countries like the United States arrest
Rehabilitationabout one in very 136 people or the possession of
17-Yesillegal drugs. It was also found that due to crime
17-Noprevention in Sweden, there are much fewer
Source; Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Incchances of getting students with drugs in comparison
(2002): Changing Public Attitudes towardthe Criminalto the seventies. Statistics have also shown that in
Justice System; Journal for Open Society InstituteSweden there are less chances of drug abuse in the
Crime prevention deals with root causesentire continent of Europe. This also applies to cases
It should be noted that most of the time, there areof drug abuse recently and five years ago. Their
cases in which people break the law because theycrime prevention strategy has received more
have no where else to turn to. Such people normallyenforcement from the criminal justice system over
come from deteriorating neighbourhoods. They feelthe past years ago and this corresponds to less
that there is not much that can be done about theircases. Sweden does not apply its drug policy to new
situation and they opt to choose crime as their onlyoffenders only, it also has a follow up program for
means for survival. Most of these criminals normallyconvicted offenders.
have very low educational backgrounds.Accidents that occur due to alcohol abuse or drunk
Consequently, their options in the formal employmentdriving are quite common in countries that have not
sector are quite limited. They need to earn a sourceimplemented certain crime prevention strategies. Local
of livelihood and still have to meet their daily needs.authorities should go out of their way to ensure that
However, the public only offers them temporary jobscrimes resulting from alcohol intake are eliminated.
that do not pay as much. Some individuals may feelThis can be achieved by introduction of
the need to deal with this lack of necessities throughbreath-testers. Drivers who exceed allowable limits
crime. Overly, the underlying problem is education, ifshould be prevented from driving by placing them
the government was to invest in education of suchinto rehabilitation centres. Such a proactive approach
criminals then there would be no need to commitwill ensure that there will be limited cases in the
crimes and all the other issues will fall into place.future. (Cox & Wade, p 105, 1998)
(Maguire, p 207-265, 2000)Gang violence can also be prevented through the use
Most criminals commit their crimes because theirof the overall community. The police can work hand
neighbourhoods make it easy for them to do so. Inin hand with local residents to monitor the activities
most Cities, there are certain localities that have beenof these gangs and these collaborative efforts will
ignored by the governing authorities of the day tohelp police during the prevention of such kinds of
such an extent that their buildings and otheroffences.
infrastructural facilities are simply deplorable. It isThere should be more emphasis on the youth in
therefore easier for criminals to break into suchorder to ensure that future crimes are not
systems and take what they would want without tocommitted. Crime prevention efforts need to be
much struggle. If some investments had been madedirected to the youth because they account for
into those neighbourhoods, then there would beabout twenty percent of all the cases reported to
better facilities and better security for its residentsthe police. It was also found that those who
thus discouraging crime.happened to be caught once were less likely to get
Certain criminals do not have a sense of moral values.caught again. However, there are cases of persistent
Their environment has served a fertile ground foroffenders that would be arrested more than once. A
moral deterioration. They see no benefit in caringresearch conducted among these repeat offenders
about what other people around them may feel as afound that there were certain characteristics
result of their actions. Consequently, most of thesecommon to most of these offenders. They are as
criminals end up committing their crimes because theyfollows;
do not know what is expected from them form- aggressiveness and anger
society. Crime prevention as a strategy for crime- impulsiveness
prevention could deal with this by targeting youth- alcohol and drug abuse
offenders. Most of them could be placed in- anti-social peer pressure
community prevention centres where they could go- no vocational skills
taught a number of societal norms. (Kenney, p23,- lack of parental supervision(Sherman, p 54, 1997)
1998)The research also identified the fact that these
Many of the neighbourhoods that some of thesebehavioural traits could be prevented by a strategy
youth come from are usually associated wit lowcalled early intervention. Most of these youth had
levels of family support. Some offenders may bepotential o become worse but with the right
tempted to commit crimes because they feel thatapproach more could be done to ensure that this did
they have nothing to loose. They do not feel lovednot continue again. Crime prevention among the
and cared for and consequently have low selfyouth can be made in such a way that there are
esteem. According to them, crime is a way of lettingcoordinated efforts towards dealing with youth
out some of their pent up anger and frustrations. Itoffenders. First of all, there can be creation of bodies
should be possible to prevent crimes of this nature ifto coordinate work done towards these efforts. On
youth were targeted. The reason why it is useful totop of this, there should be greater involvement of
target the youth is because they are not yet thatother stakeholders. The police should cooperate with
far gone; they are still at a point when they can bethe departments of children and youth affairs.
moulded and transformed. At their age, they haveEarly intervention needs to be conducted in cases
not hardened already. Such youth can be taughtwhere families seem particularly vulnerable to future
fundamental truths in and their psychological problemscrimes. Such families are normally characterised by
can be addressed adequately in community centres.the traits that were listed above. These are efforts
Since the issue of employment contributes to manythat can be conducted by the policing unit in
criminal cases, crime prevention strategies can dealconjunction with other local authorities. However,
with that issue and eliminate the need to committhere may be instances when some youth are at
crimes due to that reason. This can be achievedhigher risks than others. Those at higher risks need
through the process of instilling potential offendersto be placed under closer and more severe programs.
with job skills. Consequently, such people will have noPrevention of crime needs to be done through the
need to result to crime as a means of earning a livinginvolvement of families too. In case youth offenders
since they have other alternatives availablehave been caught, their family members need to be
Failure in past approachesconsulted on what they feel could be the best
Crime prevention should take precedence within themethods to use when tackling their child. This can be
criminal justice system because the punitive approachachieved through the conduction of conferences that
has failed. Most psychologists argue that wheninvolve law enforcement officers, social workers and
criminals are simply arrested and taken into prisonsthe parents. This will help in unveiling some of the
for a certain period of time, they may not feel theunderlying problems and will also help in the
need to reform. They actually claim that this servescustomisation of solutions to suite specific cases.
to reinforce certain criminal activities. This is because(Sherman, p 54, 1997)
they get to interact with fellow criminal and evenConclusion
learn more tricks to the trade and by the time theyCrime prevention should take the greatest
leave their prison cells, they are worse of than whenprecedence in the criminal justice system because it
they came in. What this means is that the criminalhas overwhelming public support. A survey asking
justice system is just going around in circles; criminalspeople what the law enforcement authorities need to
commit crimes, stay in prison, then go back to whereprioritise indicated that there was a need to place
they started from. When criminals go back to theirmore emphasis on crime prevention rather than other
neighbourhood, the very reason why they committedstrategies. The second reason why crime prevention
their crimes in the first place still exists. They will stillshould take up priority in the criminal justice system is
be faced with family problems, lack of employmentthe fact that most crimes are committed as a result
and other social evils. These circumstances will propelof certain social problems. Crime prevention identifies
them into crime and they will end up going back tothose problems and deals with them thereby
prison. This is the reason why drug related cases stilleliminating future cases of crime. It should also be
continue. Psychologists believe that criminals performnoted that past systems have not been effective in
criminal behaviour because of these social pressuresthe criminal justice system. They have only enforced
and they need to be addressed if the criminal justicecriminal behaviour; crime prevention is a better
system hopes to be effective in the future. Theapproach because it tackles the problem from the
ultimate solution would therefore be crime prevention.inside out. Lastly, countries that have prioritised crime
(Austin, p 34, 2001)prevention have shown statistically, that this is an
Crime prevention would be quite favourable in drugeffective method; their crime rates have reduced.
related cases instead of punitive actions. ForWith all this backing, crime prevention should be made
example, those caught should be placed in mandatorytop priority.
drug treatment centres. They could also beReferences
subjected to community service instead of lockingAustin, J. (2001): Sentencing Guidelines: A State
them up in prison cells. There was some sort ofPerspective; Ph.D., Executive Vice-President, journal
disparity in the way the criminal justice system hasfor the National Council on Crime & Delinquency,
been handling perpetrators. A person who hasVol. 3, No. 8, p 34
committed a burglary and another who has beenCox, S. & Wade, J. (1998): The Criminal Justice
caught using drugs are given more or less the sameNetwork: An Introduction; New York: McGraw-Hill, p
treatment through prison sentencing. This is not a fair105
or effective way of going about the crime problem.Kenney, D. (1998): Crime in the Schools: A
It should also be noted that there may be certainProblem-Solving Approach. Police Executive
individuals who lack the ability to move on with theirResearch Forum Journal, Vol. 8, No. 13, pp. 23
lives because the way the criminal justice system hasMaguire, E. (2000): Have Changes in Policing Reduced
been in the past is that it condemns and segregatesViolent Crime? Cambridge University Press, New
offenders. For expel, when one has been convictedYork, 2000. pp. 207-265
to serve a prison term and they complete their term,Oxford Handbook of Criminology (2003); Oxford
they not allowed to drive a car even if they have aUniversity Press, p 13
driving licence. Besides this, they are not allowed toPfeiffer, C. (2003): Trends in Juvenile Violence in
own houses or get certain jobs. What this does isEuropean Countries; McMillan Publishers, p. 55
that it frustrates them the more. Such individualsSherman, L.