Stop child abuse!
 

Welcome to our preventing child abuse Archive!

 

Article #8: SEXUAL HARASSMENT AT WORK PLACE

(Browse for more articles)

 
SEXUAL HARASSMENT AT WORKPLACE employer liability.
Each incident of sexual harassment of Amendments to Civil Rights Act in 1991,
woman at workplace results in violation added the provisions to Title VII
of "Gender Equality". The gender protecting including expanding the rights
equality is includes protection from of women to sue and collect compensatory
sexual harassment or abuse and right to damages for sexual discrimination or
work with dignity, which is a universally harassment.
recognised basic human Right. A number SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN INDIA :
of countries like U.S., U.K., Japan, A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed
Canada, Australia, India and several before Supreme Court of India, seeking
European nations have laws that prohibit gender justice for protection and
sexual harassment at work place. enforcement of fundamental and human
With more and more women coming out to rights of working women. The PIL was
complain about sexual harassment at the mainly filed for the enforcement of
workplace, feminist groups suggest severe fundamental rights of working women under
punishments and compensation to combat Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the
the situation. Sexual harassment of a Constitution of India. It was a class
female at the place of work is in action by certain social activists and
compatible with dignity and honour of a NGOs with the aim of assisting in finding
female and needs to be eliminated and the suitable methods for realisation of the
there can be no compromise with such true concept of gender equality and to
violations. prevent sexual harassment of working
Sexual harassment is a form of sex women in all workplaces through judicial
discrimination projected through process and to fill vacuum in existing
unwelcome sexual advances, request for legislation. The Supreme Court of India
sexual favours and other verbal or in 1997 held that the working women have
physical conduct with sexual overtones rights to gender equality, to work with
whether directly or by implication, dignity and to a working environment safe
particularly when submission to or and protected from sexual harassment or
rejection of such a conduct by the female abuse. Accordingly, the Supreme Court
employee was capable of being used for issued guidelines and norms for
effecting the employment of the female protection and enforcement of rights of
employee and unreasonably interfering the women at their workplaces. Further,
with her work performance and had the the Supreme Court held that these
effect of creating an intimidating or guidelines and norms must be strictly
hostile working environment for her. observed in all working places by
Any action of gesture, whether directly treating them as law declared under
or by implication, aims at or has the Article 141 of Constitution of India (The
tendency to outrange the modesty of a law declared by the Supreme Court shall
female employee, must fall under the be binding on all courts within the
general concept of the definition of territory of India).
sexual harassment. Sections 354 and 509 of Indian Penal
SEXUAL HARASSMENT UNDER HUMAN RIGHTS Code, 1860 deals with assault or criminal
PURVIEW: force to woman with intent to outrage her
Sexual harassment and sex discrimination modesty and the word, gesture or act
are consider to be violation of Human intended to insult the modesty of a
Rights. All human rights derive from the woman. If there is any violations on
dignity and worth inherent in the human women with regard to her modesty, the
person and the human person is the above sections will strictly apply and
cultural subject of Human Rights and criminal proceedings will follow
Fundamental Freedoms. The United Nations immediately on a complaint made to a
Organisation (UNO), keeping with its nearest police station. The offences
character to promote and encourage under section 509 are cognizable and are
respect of Human Rights and Fundamental non-bailable.
Freedoms for all without distinction, Sec.354: Assault or criminal force to
came out with an International Bill of woman with intent to outrage her modesty.
Human Rights consisting of: - Whoever assaults or uses criminal force
(a) Universal Declaration of Human to any woman, intending to outrage or
Rights, 1948 knowing it to be likely that he will
(b) The International covenant on civil thereby outrage her modesty, shall be
and Political Rights, 1966 punished with imprisonment of either
(c) The International covenant of description for a term which may be
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, extend to two years or with fine, or with
1966 and both.
(d) The Optional protocol, 1966 providing Sec. 509 : Word, gesture or act intended
for the right of the individual to to insult the modesty of a woman. -
petition International agencies. Whoever, intending to insult the modesty
The U.N.O. held that all human rights and of any woman, utters any word, makes any
fundamental freedoms are indivisible and sound or gesture, or exhibits any object,
interdependent; equal attention and intending that such word or sound shall
urgent consideration should be given to be heard, or that such gesture or object
the implementation, promotion and shall be seen, by such woman, or intrudes
protection all human rights. The upon the privacy of such woman, shall be
following are the principles on which the punished with simple imprisonment for a
above charters were introduced: term which may extend to one year; or
1) All Human beings, without with fine, or with both.
distinction, have been brought within the Apart from this, if a woman faces any
scope of human rights instruments. kind of sexual harassment at workplace
2) Equality of application without can directly make a complaint to the
distinction of race, sex, language or State Women Commissions or National
religion: and Commission for Women. The Women
3) Emphasis on international Commission will follow-up the complaints,
co-operation for implementation. informs to concern police stations to
Article 1, 2 and 7 of Universal initiate criminal proceedings and directs
Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 deals the employer to conduct an enquiry and
with equal in dignity, rights & freedoms recommend to suspend the concerned
and equal protection against any harasser with an immediate effect pending
discrimination. enquiry.
Article 1 : All human beings are born The victim of sexual harassment can claim
free and equal in dignity and rights. damages/compensation on concerned
They are endowed with reason and harasser by way of filing a civil suit
conscience and should act towards one under civil jurisdiction.
another n a spirit of brotherhood. The Constitution of India guaranteed
Article 2 : Everyone is entitled to all fundamental rights to its citizens. When
the rights and freedoms set forth in this we compare provisions of the Constitution
declaration, without distinction of any of India to that of Universal Declaration
kind such as race, colour, sex language, of Human Rights, we find many Articles
religion, political or other opinion, have the same spirit. Article 14, 15 and
national or social origin, property, 21 of Constitution of India mentions key
birth or other status (first part of words on Equality before law, prohibition
Art.2) of discrimination on grounds of religion,
Article 7: All are entitled to equal race, caste, sex or place of birth and
protection against any discrimination in protection of life and personal liberty.
violation of this Declaration against any The Supreme Court of India for the first
incitement to such discrimination (Second time in Vishakha and others Vs. State of
sentence of Art.7) Rajasthan and others (1997 (6) Supreme
Part II of Article 2 (2) and 3 of Court Cases 241) dealt with sexual
International covenant on Economic, harassment on women. The Supreme Court
Social and Cultural Rights, 1966 also made the definition of sexual harassment
deals with discrimination of any kind and and laid down certain guidelines. It
equal right of men and women. also specified the duties of the
Article 2 (2) : The States Parties to the employer, preventive steps, awareness of
present covenant undertake to guarantee the rights of female employees and
that rights enunciated in the present workers initiative to curb sexual
covenant will be exercised wi;thoud harassment at workplace.
discrimination of any kind as to race, The Supreme Court said that, it shall be
colour, sex, language, religion, the duty of the employer or other
political or other opinion, national or responsible persons in workplaces or
social origin, property, birth or other other institutions to prevent or deter
status. the commission of acts of sexual
Article 3 : The States parties to the harassment and to provide the procedures
present covenant undertake to ensure the for the resolution, settlement or
equal right of men and women to the prosecution of acts of sexual harassment
enjoyment of all Economic, Social and by taking all steps required.
Cultural Rights set forth in the present For the purpose of definition of sexual
covenant. harassment the Supreme Court said that,
SEXUAL HARASSMENT & SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION the sexual harassment includes such
IN U.S. : unwelcome sexually determined behaviour
In the United States, two major federal (whether directly or by implication) as :
laws prohibit sexual harassment in (a) physical contact and advances;
employment and educational settings, (b) a demand or request for sexual
which are - Title VII of the Civil Rights favours;
Act, 1964 and Title IX of the Education (c) sexually - coloured remarks;
Act, 1972. These laws authorise federal (d) showing pronogrphy;
agencies to investigate complaints of (e) any other unwelcome physical verbal
sexual harassment. They also permit or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.
victims to file law suits against The Supreme Court of India rendered yet
employers or schools seeking to end the another Judgment on sexual harassment in
harassment and to obtain monetary AEPC Vs. A.K. Chopra (1999 (1) Supreme
compensation for the harm resulting from Court Cases 759). The case is about a
it. Many States have also adopted laws woman employee of Apparel Export
prohibiting sexual harassment. Title VII Promotion Council, who worked as the
applies to employers with 15 or more private secretary to A.K. Chopra, the
employees including State and local Chairman of the company. She complained
Governments. It also applies to to the Personnel Director that the
employment agencies and to labour chairman was sexually harassing her.
organisations, as well as to the Federal Despite her repeated protests, he was
Government. making sexual advances by 'trying to
Under U.S. laws, the unwelcome sexual touch her' and 'sit close to her'. The
advances, requests for sexual favours, company, immediately suspended him and
and other verbal or physical conduct of a ordered a departmental enquiry. The
sexual nature constitute sexual enquired confirmed female employee's
harassment when this conduct explicitly position that the chairman tried to touch
or implicitly affects an individual's her with a sexual motive and the chairman
work performance, or creates an was dismissed from service.
intimidating, hostile, or offensive work The chairman challenged the disciplinary
environment. committee order in Delhi High Court and
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity the harasser was successful on the ground
Commission (EEOC) has made certain that the chairman only 'tried to molest'
parameters to test sexual harassment at but did not 'in fact molest' the female
work places. employee. By shocking with the verdict,
· The victim as well as the harasser may the company filed appeal before the same
be a woman or a man. High Court which was heard by Division
· The victim does not have to be of the Bench (two member Bench). Interestingly,
opposite sex. the Division Bench agreed with the
· The harasser can be the victim's findings of single judge and reiterated
supervisor, an agent of the employer, a that the chairman not 'actually molested'
supervisor in another area, a co-worker, the female employee.
or a non-employee, a teacher or As against the Judgment, the company once
professor, a student, a friend or a again filed an appeal in the Supreme
stranger. Court. One of the issues that was
· The victim does not have to be the deliberated at length by this court was
person harassed but could be anyone " whether physical contact with the woman
affected by the offensive conduct. was an essential ingredient of a charge
· Unlawful sexual harassment may occur of sexual harassment ".
without economic injury to or discharge The Supreme Court while setting aside the
of the victim. High Court and upholding the dismissal of
· The harasser's conduct must be chairman held that:a) The attempts by the
unwelcome. superior to sit close to the female
Perceptions differ about what behaviours employee and touch her, though
constitute sexual harassment. However, unsuccessful, would amount to 'sexual
typical examples of sexual harassment harassment'. The behaviour of the
include sexually oriented gestures, superior did not cease to be outrageous
jokes, or remarks that are unwelcome; in the absence of an actual assault by
repeated and unwanted sexual advances; the superior.b) In the context of a
touching or other unwelcome bodily female employee the sexual harassment at
contact; and physical intimidation. the work place is a form of sex
Sexual harassment can occur when one discrimination which any be projected
person has power over another and uses it through unwelcome sexual advances,
to coerce the person to accept unwanted request for sexual favours and other
sexual attention. verbal or physical conduct with sexual
Even, if the co-workers telling overtones, whether directly or by
repeatedly the sexual jokes, posting implication. This would be particularly
pronographic photos, or making any so when submission or rejection of such
unwelcome sexual innuendos to another conduct by the female employee could be
co-worker is also sexual harassment. used to affect her employment by
Both men and women can be harassers or unreasonably interfering with her work
victims of sexual harassment. However, performance thereby, creating a hostile
researches indicate that women are more working atmosphere for her.c) Where the
likely to be the victims. Approximately conduct of a superior towards his junior
15,000 sexual harassment cases are female employee was wholly against
brought to U.S. Equal Employment moral sanctions and was offensive to her
Opportunity Commission every year. Media modesty, any lenient action would
and Governmental surveys estimate the demoralise working women. Therefore, the
percentage of women being sexually punishment of dismissal from service was
harassed in the U.S. workplace at 40% to commensurate with the gravity of the
60%. The EEOC looks at the whole record superior's behaviour.d) Each incident of
the circumstances, such as the nature of sexual harassment at workplace violates
the sexual advances, and the context in the fundamental right to gender equality
which the alleged incidents occurred. A and the right to life and liberty
determination on the allegations is made guaranteed by the constitution of India.
from the facts on a case-by-case basis. The fundamental right in a the
Bernes Vs. Train (1974) is commonly Constitution cover all facts of gender
viewed as the first sexual harassment equality including prevention of sexual
case in America, even though the term harassment and abuse. The courts are
sexual harassment was not used. In 1976, under a constitutional obligation to
Williams Vs. Saxbe established sexual protect and preserve those rights.e)
harassment as a form of sex determination International instruments like Convention
when sexual advances by a male on Prevention of All forms of
supervisors towards a female employee. Discrimination Against Women, Beijing
In 1980 the EEOC issued regulations Declaration on Women and International
defining sexual harassment and stating it Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
as a form of sex discrimination Rights cast an obligation on the Indian
prohibited under Civil Rights Act, 1964. Government to senitise its laws. The
In 1986, in the case of Michalle Vinson courts are under an obligation to see
Vs. Merit One Saving Bank, the Supreme that this message is accepted and
Court first recognised sexual harassment followed.
as a violation of Title VII, established K.V.RAMANA
the standards for analysing whether the MURTHYramanamurty9967@yahoo.co.
conduct was welcome and levels of






1- A- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47- 48- 49- 50- 51- 52- 53- 54- 55- 56- 57-